Business Dystopia Post Automation Utopia v0.1 draft

DOC-04 RAIDD

RAIDD

Risks, assumptions, issues, decisions and dependencies, with owners.

Programme
Post Automation Utopia programme
Version
v0.1 draft
Status
Draft for review
Date
10 Nov 2026
Owner
PMO Lead
Approver
Programme Director
Type
Google Sheet

Risks

v0.1 draft | 10 November 2026

Post Automation Utopia programme | Owner: PMO Lead

Each risk has one owner. Score is likelihood multiplied by impact. The rating follows the thresholds on the Key tab.

IDRiskCause and effectLikelihood (1 to 5)Impact (1 to 5)ScoreRatingResponseOwnerRelated plan stepsStatusDate raised
R-01Automation moves at a different pace from the scenariosAutomation arrives much faster, so that people lose income before floors exist, or much slower, so that the cost of floors outruns the dividend.4416RedPlan against slow, central and fast scenarios. Use observatory data to set phase timing. Design contingency income support in Phase 0.Economic Security LeadP0-05, P1-02Open10 Nov 2026
R-02Political mandate is not won or is lostGovernments decline to adopt the plan, or reverse adoption after a change of government.4520RedBuild broad coalitions and cross-party support. Use pilot evidence. Put entitlements into law so they are hard to reverse.Engagement and Legitimacy LeadP0-07, P2-01Open10 Nov 2026
R-03Ownership of automated capital concentratesA few firms or countries own most automated capital, so the dividend available to share is small.4416RedDesign public and shared ownership models, competition policy and international transfers.Economic Security LeadP1-05, P2-02Open10 Nov 2026
R-04Inequality between countries widensLower-income countries fall further behind because the gains accrue where the capital is owned.4416RedJust transition finance facility, global income support and technology transfer.International financial institutionsP1-10, P2-05Open10 Nov 2026
R-05Fiscal or monetary instabilityLarge transfers cause inflation, capital flight or debt stress.3412AmberIntroduce floors in stages. Involve central banks in the design. Size transfers against real productive capacity.Central banksP0-05, P2-01Open10 Nov 2026
R-06Automated systems are unsafe or unaccountableAutomated systems cause harm at scale or operate without meaningful human control.3515RedPut the safety and accountability regime in place before scaling. Certify systems. Keep human oversight of decisions about rights.Automation and AI Governance LeadP1-03, P2-09Open10 Nov 2026
R-07Automation pushes ecological limits furtherThe energy, water and mineral demand of automation adds pressure on planetary boundaries that are already crossed.4416RedSet a planetary footprint budget. Require circular hardware. Give proxy panels a formal say on high-impact deployments.Planetary Stewardship LeadP1-09, P2-08Open10 Nov 2026
R-08People lose purpose and social tiesWithout paid work, people lose meaning, status and community.3412AmberDeliver the purpose, learning and participation pillar. Recognise contribution. Fund local institutions.Purpose, Learning and Participation LeadP1-08, P3-06Open10 Nov 2026
R-09Housing delivery is held upLand, planning and materials limit the homes for everyone target.4312AmberAppraise land reform options. Retrofit first. Use automated construction. Build local delivery capacity.Regional and local governmentsP1-07, P2-04Open10 Nov 2026
R-10Payment and identity systems are used for surveillancePayment and identity systems are used to monitor or exclude people.3412AmberPrivacy by design, no mandatory biometrics and independent data oversight.Design Authority LeadP1-11Open10 Nov 2026
R-11Proxy representation is not seen as legitimateThe proxies for animals, plants and ecosystems are captured by other interests, contested or ignored.339AmberPublish the proxy method. Apply conflict-of-interest rules. Rotate panel members. Include Indigenous knowledge holders.Planetary Stewardship LeadP0-03, P1-09Open10 Nov 2026
R-12Industry resists the dividendOwners of automated capital resist dividend or tax measures.4312AmberEngage industry early. Offer stable rules. Develop shared-benefit models.Engagement and Legitimacy LeadP1-05, P2-06Open10 Nov 2026
R-13The programme loses continuityOver several decades the programme loses focus, funding or leadership.4312AmberUse phase gates and independent assurance. Vest ownership in institutions, not individuals. Refresh the plan periodically.Programme DirectorX-01, X-02Open10 Nov 2026
R-14Geopolitical division blocks the compactConflict or rivalry between states prevents an international compact.3412AmberStart with a coalition of willing states. Keep the compact open to later accession. Use regional routes.Legal and Policy LeadP1-01Open10 Nov 2026
R-15The transition harms vulnerable groupsOlder people, disabled people or people on low incomes lose out while systems change.3412AmberApply no-detriment protection, equality impact assessments and supplements for additional needs.Basic Services LeadP2-01, P3-02Open10 Nov 2026
R-16Requirements of different user groups conflictHuman requirements such as housing and energy conflict with the requirements of non-human users, and are settled in favour of the group with a voice.4312AmberTreat ecological Must requirements as constraints. The Design Authority arbitrates with proxy panel input. Log each conflict.Design Authority LeadP0-08Open10 Nov 2026

Assumptions

v0.1 draft | 10 November 2026

Post Automation Utopia programme | Owner: PMO Lead

What the plan takes to be true, and how each assumption will be tested.

IDAssumptionAreaHow it will be testedOwnerRelated plan stepsStatusDate logged
A-01Automation will in time be able to perform substantially all paid tasks, though the pace is uncertain.Programme premiseCheck against observatory data every year.Economic Security LeadP1-02Untested10 Nov 2026
A-02Productivity gains from automation are large enough to fund adequate floors once a share is captured.Fiscal designTest in Phase 0 modelling and Phase 1 pilots.Economic Security LeadP0-05Untested10 Nov 2026
A-03Enough states will join a coalition to make a compact viable.Legal pathwayTest in the legal and treaty pathway work.Legal and Policy LeadP0-09Untested10 Nov 2026
A-04The mandates of existing UN bodies, central banks and international financial institutions can be extended, so no new global organisation is needed.Institutional designConfirm in the legal and treaty pathway work.Legal and Policy LeadP0-09Untested10 Nov 2026
A-05Human proxies can represent non-human users credibly enough for decisions to rest on their advice.RequirementsTest the proxy method in the global consultation.Planetary Stewardship LeadP0-07Untested10 Nov 2026
A-06Automated construction can cut the cost and time of housing delivery substantially.HousingTest in the housing pilots.Basic Services LeadP1-07Untested10 Nov 2026
A-07Evidence from pilots will transfer between economies and cultures with adaptation.EvaluationChoose varied pilot sites and evaluate transferability explicitly.Benefits and Assurance LeadP1-04Untested10 Nov 2026
A-08Phase 0 can be resourced by the sponsoring institutions without creating a new legal entity.MobilisationConfirm at mobilisation.SponsorP0-01Untested10 Nov 2026
A-09Timelines and effort at v0.1 are indicative and relative. Nothing has been costed.PlanningReplace with a costed plan in the Phase 1 business case.Programme DirectorP0-10, P0-11Untested10 Nov 2026
A-10Digital access can be made near-universal, with non-digital routes kept for people who need them.ServicesTest in the digital public infrastructure work.Design Authority LeadP1-11Untested10 Nov 2026

Issues

v0.1 draft | 10 November 2026

Post Automation Utopia programme | Owner: PMO Lead

Things that are already true and need action.

IDIssuePriorityActionOwnerRelated plan stepsStatusDate raised
I-01No sponsor or funding is confirmed for the programme.HighIdentify sponsoring institutions and secure the resources for Phase 0.SponsorP0-01Open10 Nov 2026
I-02Displacement from automation and AI is already under way before any income floor exists.HighUse existing social protection as a bridge. Give priority to the observatory and the pilots.Economic Security LeadP1-02, P1-04Open10 Nov 2026
I-03Seven of the nine planetary boundaries are already assessed as crossed.HighTreat ecological requirements as constraints on every pillar.Planetary Stewardship LeadP1-09Open10 Nov 2026
I-04There is no agreed international definition of an adequate income floor.MediumCommission work on an adequacy benchmark as part of the evidence review.Design Authority LeadP0-04Open10 Nov 2026
I-05Almost half of the world's people have no social protection, so many countries start without delivery systems.HighBuild delivery capacity through the just transition finance facility.International financial institutionsP1-10Open10 Nov 2026
I-06The requirements of non-human users have been written on their behalf and are not yet validated by the proxy bodies.MediumValidate with the proxies during the global consultation.Planetary Stewardship LeadP0-07, P0-08Open10 Nov 2026

Decisions

v0.1 draft | 10 November 2026

Post Automation Utopia programme | Owner: PMO Lead

Decisions taken so far, and decisions the programme still has to take.

IDDecisionStatusDecision makerDate decidedTo be decided in stepOwnerNotes
D-01The Plan, RAIDD, RACI and PID cover the real-world transition programme, phased over decades, with finalising the plan as its opening phase.AgreedSponsor10 Nov 2026Programme DirectorSet in the project brief.
D-02Owners are generic programme roles and institution types, never named people. One set of role names is used in every document.AgreedSponsor10 Nov 2026PMO LeadSet in the project brief.
D-03The scope is global. Documents are in UK English and written as a serious real-world proposal.AgreedSponsor10 Nov 2026Programme DirectorSet in the project brief.
D-04Timelines and effort are indicative and sized relatively (S, M, L, XL). They are not costed.AgreedSponsor10 Nov 2026Programme DirectorSet in the project brief.
D-05Documents are Google Docs and Google Sheets held in the programme folder and listed in the Control register.AgreedSponsor10 Nov 2026PMO LeadSet in the project brief.
D-06Animals, plants and ecosystems are treated as users. Their requirements are written on their behalf, each with a named human proxy as the source.AgreedSponsor10 Nov 2026Planetary Stewardship LeadSet in the project brief.
D-07The programme has five phases: Phase 0 Finalise the plan (2027 to mid 2028), Phase 1 Foundations and pilots (to 2032), Phase 2 Scale national floors (to 2040), Phase 3 Transition at scale (to 2055) and Phase 4 Stewardship.ProposedProgramme BoardP0-02Programme DirectorRecommended in this draft.
D-08The programme uses the 23 roles in the RACI: six governance roles, seven workstream leads and ten types of delivery institution.ProposedProgramme BoardP0-02PMO LeadRecommended in this draft.
D-09What mix of an unconditional cash floor and universal basic services gives income security.OpenProgramme BoardP0-06Design Authority LeadThis draft assumes both will be needed.
D-10Whether the programme is governed by a coalition of adopting states hosted by UN bodies, or by a new organisation.OpenProgramme BoardP0-09Legal and Policy LeadThis draft assumes a coalition hosted by UN bodies.
D-11How the proxies for non-human users are appointed, and how conflicts of interest are handled.OpenProgramme BoardP0-03Planetary Stewardship LeadA proposed method is in the User Requirements Document.
D-12How the returns from automated capital are captured: tax, public ownership, voluntary commitments by firms, or a combination.OpenProgramme BoardP0-06Economic Security LeadDesign work continues in P1-05.

Dependencies

v0.1 draft | 10 November 2026

Post Automation Utopia programme | Owner: PMO Lead

What the programme needs from others, what its parts need from each other, and what others need from it.

IDDependencyTypeProvided byNeeded for (plan steps)OwnerStatusDate logged
DP-01National governments willing to host pilots and to legislate income floors.InboundNational governmentsP1-04, P2-01SponsorOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-02UN bodies willing to convene the compact and host its secretariat.InboundUN bodiesP1-01Legal and Policy LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-03Central banks advising on monetary effects and stewarding public wealth funds where they have a mandate.InboundCentral banksP1-05, P2-02Economic Security LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-04Industry supplying data on automation deployment to the observatory.InboundIndustryP1-02Automation and AI Governance LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-05Conservation science bodies acting as proxies for wild animals, plants, fungi and ecosystems.InboundConservation science bodiesP0-07, P1-09Planetary Stewardship LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-06Indigenous peoples' organisations taking part, and giving or withholding consent.InboundIndigenous peoples' organisationsP0-07, P1-09Engagement and Legitimacy LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-07Academia and research institutes providing evidence, modelling and independent evaluation.InboundAcademia and research institutesP0-04, P0-05, P1-12Design Authority LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-08International financial institutions running the just transition finance facility and global transfers.InboundInternational financial institutionsP1-10, P2-05Economic Security LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-09Final requirements depend on the results of the global consultation and the options appraisal.InternalEngagement and Legitimacy LeadP0-08Design Authority LeadOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-10Scale-up in Phase 2 depends on the Phase 1 evaluation and gate decision.InternalBenefits and Assurance LeadP2-01, P2-03, P2-04Programme DirectorOpen10 Nov 2026
DP-11Existing global frameworks (the Sustainable Development Goals, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement) rely on the programme staying consistent with them.OutboundLegal and Policy LeadX-04Legal and Policy LeadOpen10 Nov 2026

Key

Post Automation Utopia programme | v0.1 draft | 10 November 2026 | Owner: PMO Lead

Rating thresholds, scoring scales, list values and a count of what the log holds.

Risk rating thresholds

RatingScore at or above
Red15
Amber8
Blue values are inputs. Change a threshold and the ratings on the Risks tab follow. Lower scores are Green. Source: recommended at v0.1, to be agreed with the tolerances in step P0-02.

Scoring scales

ScoreLikelihoodImpact
1Rare. Not expected during the programme.Minor. Absorbed within one workstream.
2Unlikely. Could happen, but would be a surprise.Moderate. Delays or weakens one workstream.
3Possible. About as likely as not during a phase.Serious. Delays a phase or weakens a pillar.
4Likely. Expected during a phase unless action is taken.Major. A pillar fails in many countries, or a phase is put back by years.
5Almost certain. Already happening or expected soon.Severe. Lasting harm to people or ecosystems, or the programme fails.
Score is likelihood multiplied by impact, from 1 to 25.

List values

Risk statusAssumption statusIssue statusIssue priorityDecision statusDependency statusDependency type
OpenUntestedOpenHighAgreedOpenInbound
ClosedConfirmedResolvedMediumProposedAgreedInternal
DisprovedLowOpenMetOutbound
Inbound: the programme needs something from outside. Internal: one part of the programme needs another. Outbound: others rely on the programme.

What the log holds

ItemCount
Risks16
Risks rated Red6
Risks rated Amber10
Risks rated Green0
Assumptions10
Issues6
Decisions12
Decisions agreed6
Decisions proposed2
Decisions open4
Dependencies11